schutz-vor-strahlung.ch, 29 May 2019 - translation
[All interviews are in Swiss German.]
We wanted to know why Prof. Röösli considers WLAN to be negligible, because building biologists have been recognizing WLAN as a disturbing factor for a good night's sleep for years.
"If it were possible to prove electrosensitivity only once, that would question the whole model of thinking."
Read more »
 |
| Professor Martin Röösli |
Martin Röösli is Professor in Environmental Epidemiology at the Tropical Institute in Basel and also a member of ICNIRP. He also presides over the Advisory Expert Group NIS (BERENIS), which works for the Federal Office for the Environment (FOEN), and continues to work in the "Mobile Communications and Radiation" working group, which is mandated by the Confederation. We were allowed to interview him.
WLAN [Wi-Fi] and the detectability of electrosensitivity
WLAN [Wi-Fi] and the detectability of electrosensitivity
We wanted to know why Prof. Röösli considers WLAN to be negligible, because building biologists have been recognizing WLAN as a disturbing factor for a good night's sleep for years.
"If it were possible to prove electrosensitivity only once, that would question the whole model of thinking."
- Martin Röösli, epidemiologist and FOEN consultant
According to a 2004 survey , 5% of respondents said they were electrosensitive. According to another survey in 2009 , it was 8.6%. An additional increase in the number of persons affected by 2019 is to be expected. Around 800,000 people in Switzerland are therefore likely to react sensitively to electrosmog today. Nevertheless, Prof. Röösli finds no scientific proof of electrosensitivity.
No comments:
Post a Comment